Skip to content
Scammers.com
Affinity fraud

Positive Projections, Hidden Losses: Court Enters Modified Judgment in SEC Affinity Investment Fraud

A court found Evarist Amah liable for fraud in raising $698K from fellow members of his religion. A July 2026 modified judgment set a $446,458 penalty.

By Scammers.com Staff · · 5 min read

Illustration: Investing and crypto scams

Published Oct. 12, 2026. Case statuses are current as of that date, based on SEC records.

Affinity fraud exploits the trust inside a close community. In this case, a federal court has already ruled: it found Evarist C. Amah liable for fraudulently soliciting investments from fellow members of his religion, and a modified final judgment was entered on July 15, 2026 [1].

The case is SEC v. Evarist C. Amah, No. 7:21-cv-06694 (KMK), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Unlike most SEC cases we cover, this one is no longer just allegations: liability was decided on summary judgment.

What the SEC alleged and what the court found

According to the SEC's complaint, filed Aug. 9, 2021, Amah ran a years-long scheme that raised about $698,000 from fellow members of his religion using false and misleading statements about his investment performance [1].

On Sept. 28, 2023, the district court granted the SEC's motion for summary judgment and found Amah liable for fraudulently soliciting investments by "consistently offer[ing] positive projections while failing to disclose the serious losses he consistently incurred," the SEC said [1].

A long path to a final number

  • July 2, 2024: The court entered a final judgment enjoining Amah from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the Investment Advisers Act. It ordered disgorgement of $10,000, prejudgment interest of $1,617.82 and a civil penalty of $669,667.
  • Feb. 24, 2026: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment as to liability and remedies under the Securities Act and Exchange Act, but vacated and remanded the part based on the Advisers Act claims.
  • On remand: The SEC moved to dismiss its Advisers Act claims and asked for a modified judgment.
  • July 15, 2026: The court entered a modified final judgment permanently enjoining Amah from violating the antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and Exchange Act, ordering $10,000 in disgorgement plus $1,617.82 in prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty of $446,458 [1].

The SEC's dismissal of its Advisers Act claims means those particular claims are no longer part of the judgment. The antifraud findings under the Securities Act and Exchange Act stand. The release does not mention any criminal case, and we did not check whether Amah sought further appeal of the modified judgment.

Why affinity fraud works

People naturally extend trust to someone who shares their faith, culture or community. A promoter who is a familiar face at services or events can skip the skepticism a stranger would face, and victims are often reluctant to report losses that would embarrass a fellow member. The SEC's investor education office publishes guidance on investment scams targeting groups.

How an SEC civil case works

The Securities and Exchange Commission is a civil regulator. It cannot send anyone to prison. When it sues, it asks a federal judge for remedies such as an injunction (a court order not to break the securities laws again), disgorgement (giving up money obtained through the alleged violations), prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and sometimes bars from serving as a company officer or director or from working in the securities industry. Criminal charges, when they exist, are brought separately by the Justice Department.

A complaint is the SEC's side of the story. Until a court rules, or a defendant settles, the claims in it are allegations. Many defendants settle "without admitting or denying" the allegations, which means they accept a judgment and its penalties without conceding that the SEC's account is accurate. A "consent" that is "subject to court approval" is not final until a judge signs it. A "bifurcated" settlement resolves liability and the injunction now while leaving the dollar amounts for the judge to decide later. A default judgment is entered when a defendant does not respond to the lawsuit; it is a ruling against that defendant, but it is not a finding after a trial.

Red flags of affinity fraud

  • An investment promoted mainly through a religious or community network.
  • Pressure not to "doubt" a fellow member or to keep the opportunity quiet.
  • Rosy projections with no statements from an independent custodian.
  • Losses never mentioned, even in down markets.

Before you hand anyone money for an investment

  • Check the seller. Search the person and firm on Investor.gov and FINRA BrokerCheck. People who sell securities for commissions generally must be registered.
  • Check the offering. Search the company name in the SEC's EDGAR database and your state securities regulator's enforcement actions.
  • Treat "guaranteed" returns as a warning. Real investments carry risk. Promises of fixed monthly profits, or a guarantee that you can't lose your principal, are hallmarks of Ponzi-style schemes.
  • Watch for pressure and secrecy. Deadlines, "sold out" claims, or requests to wire money to a personal or unfamiliar account deserve a pause.
  • Ask how you get your money out. Excuses, delays, or new conditions when you try to withdraw are a serious red flag.

If you think you were affected

  1. Save your records: account statements, wire confirmations, emails, texts and marketing materials.
  2. Report it to the SEC at sec.gov/tcr and to your state securities regulator. If money was stolen, you can also report to the FBI at ic3.gov.
  3. Follow the court case. If a receiver or fair fund is created, notices about claims are usually posted on the court docket or a receiver's website. The SEC does not charge fees to return money.
  4. Beware of "recovery" offers. Scammers often target people who already lost money, promising to get it back for an upfront fee.

Case status (as of Oct. 12, 2026)

Defendant Court Status Source
Evarist C. Amah U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. (No. 7:21-cv-06694) Found liable on summary judgment Sept. 28, 2023; Second Circuit affirmed in part Feb. 24, 2026; modified final judgment entered July 15, 2026 ($10,000 disgorgement, $1,617.82 interest, $446,458 penalty) [1]

Statuses can change. An SEC complaint contains allegations, not findings, unless a court has ruled.

Sources

  1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Litigation Release No. 26620, "SEC Obtains Modified Final Judgment Against Individual Charged with Defrauding Fellow Members of His Religion," Aug. 26, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26620
  2. Modified Final Judgment, SEC v. Amah. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/litreleases/2026/judg26620.pdf

Corrections and updates: If you are named in this article, or represent someone who is, and believe anything here is inaccurate or out of date (including a dismissal, judgment, settlement or change in case status), please contact us at editorandchief@scammers.com. We will review it and update the article promptly.

  • #affinity fraud
  • #religious community
  • #SEC judgment
  • #New York
  • #Evarist Amah

Keep reading