Skip to content
Scammers.com
Investment fraud

Fake Screenshots, Real Losses: Denver Day Trader Ian Bell Settles SEC Fraud Case Over Money Raised From Athletes and Others

SEC alleged Denver day trader Ian Bell used fake screenshots to raise $1.3M from 29 investors, incl. pro athletes. He settled without admitting or denying.

By Scammers.com Staff · · 5 min read

Illustration: Investing and crypto scams

Published Oct. 12, 2026. Case statuses are current as of that date, based on SEC records.

Some of the investors were professional athletes in Colorado. Others were their family and friends, who signed on because of what they'd heard. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission, what they'd heard was false.

On Dec. 9, 2024, the SEC charged Denver resident Ian G. Bell with securities fraud for lying to investors and misappropriating their money in a day-trading scheme [1]. In February 2026, the court entered a final judgment, which Bell consented to without admitting or denying the allegations [3].

What the SEC alleged

According to the complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado [1][2]:

  • The raise. Between July 2020 and March 2023, Bell raised more than $1.3 million from at least 29 investors, including professional athletes in Colorado. The complaint doesn't identify them, and neither do we.
  • The lies. Bell allegedly misrepresented his trading performance, including by sending many investors fabricated screenshots of account performance.
  • Word of mouth. Several investors then referred family and friends to Bell because of those false statements, according to the SEC.
  • The losses. The SEC alleged Bell lost nearly all of the money, kept hundreds of thousands of dollars for himself, and lied about his efforts to repay investors.

"When things sound too good to be true, they often are, which is why it is crucial that investors research any firm or individual who is seeking to manage their hard-earned money, even if they come recommended by friends of family," said Jason Burt, then regional director of the SEC's Denver office [1].

How the SEC case ended

On Feb. 23, 2026, the court entered a final consent judgment against Bell [3]. According to the SEC, without admitting or denying the allegations, Bell agreed to be permanently enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5; to be barred from participating in securities offerings except for his own account; and to pay $339,848.84 in disgorgement plus $98,570.64 in prejudgment interest, deemed satisfied by a forfeiture order in the parallel criminal case, United States v. Bell, No. 24-cr-00345-PAB (D. Colo.) [3].

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado unsealed criminal charges against Bell in December 2024 [1]. The SEC's release mentions the forfeiture order but does not describe a plea, verdict or sentence, and we did not review the criminal docket. We do not report a criminal outcome here.

Screenshots aren't statements

A screenshot of a trading account is easy to fake. Before investing with an individual trader, ask for statements sent directly from a registered broker-dealer, and check the person on BrokerCheck and Investor.gov.

What an SEC civil case is (and isn't)

The SEC is a civil regulator. When it "charges" someone, it files a lawsuit in federal court or brings an administrative proceeding asking for remedies such as injunctions, repayment of allegedly ill-gotten gains (disgorgement), civil money penalties and industry bars. It cannot send anyone to prison. Criminal charges, when there are any, are brought separately by federal prosecutors, and a defendant in a criminal case is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Allegations in an SEC complaint are claims the agency must prove in court unless a defendant settles. When a defendant settles "without admitting or denying" the allegations, the court or the Commission enters an order, but the defendant has not conceded that the allegations are true. Throughout this article, statements about what happened are allegations or findings as described by the SEC, not established facts, unless we say a court entered a judgment or a defendant pleaded guilty.

Red flags in this case

  • Performance 'proof' shared as screenshots.
  • An unregistered individual pooling friends' money to day-trade.
  • Referrals from people who are only repeating what the trader told them.

How to check an investment before you hand over money

  • Look up the person and the firm on Investor.gov and FINRA BrokerCheck. A clean search is not proof of legitimacy, but a missing or mismatched record is a reason to stop.
  • Read the offering documents yourself, and ask a fee-only professional you found independently to read them too.
  • Be skeptical of "guaranteed" or fixed high returns. Real investments carry risk, and promises of safety plus high yield are a classic warning sign.
  • Be wary of pressure. Deadlines, "limited allocations" and repeated calls are sales tactics, not investment analysis.
  • Don't let trust in a group replace due diligence. Fraud often spreads through churches, ethnic and professional communities, online chat groups and friends-of-friends referrals.

If you think you were affected

  1. Keep everything: account statements, emails, texts, wire and payment records, and any marketing material.
  2. Report it to the SEC at sec.gov/tcr. If a criminal case is involved, you can also contact the FBI at ic3.gov or the prosecutors' victim-witness office.
  3. Watch for a receiver or fair fund. In some SEC cases, money is later returned to harmed investors through a court-appointed receiver or a distribution fund. Notices are posted on sec.gov.
  4. Beware of "recovery" offers. People who lost money are often targeted again by scammers promising to recover it for an upfront fee. Legitimate receivers and the SEC do not charge you to file a claim.

Case status (as of Oct. 12, 2026)

Defendant Court Status as of Oct. 12, 2026 Source
Ian G. Bell, Denver U.S. District Court, D. Colo. (SEC civil No. 24-cv-03403; criminal No. 24-cr-00345-PAB) SEC final consent judgment Feb. 23, 2026, without admitting or denying; disgorgement $339,848.84 plus interest, deemed satisfied by criminal forfeiture order. Criminal outcome not described by SEC; not verified [3]

Statuses can change. SEC allegations are claims, not findings of wrongdoing, unless a court has ruled.

Sources

  1. SEC Press Release 2024-192, "SEC Charges Ian Bell with Defrauding Professional Athletes and Others in Fraudulent Day-Trading Scheme," Dec. 9, 2024. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-192
  2. SEC complaint, SEC v. Bell (D. Colo.). https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2024/comp-pr2024-192.pdf
  3. SEC Litigation Release No. 26488, Feb. 24, 2026. https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26488

Corrections and updates: If you are named in this article, or represent someone who is, and believe anything here is inaccurate or out of date (including a dismissal, judgment, settlement or change in case status), please contact us at editorandchief@scammers.com. We will review it and update the article promptly.

  • #day trading
  • #investment fraud
  • #athletes
  • #referral fraud
  • #SEC
  • #Ian Bell

Keep reading